Three Reasons Solar Will Outshine Fossil Fuels In Mexico

Posted on October 28, 2014
Posted By: Camilo Patrignani

When Mexico reformed its energy markets to attract foreign investment, analysts focused bullish outlooks on natural gas and petroleum. And without a doubt, the country will attract billions in new fossil fuel projects. 

Mexico is in a difficult position. Combine a dependence on imported natural gas, limited hydropower and coal resources, creaky grid infrastructure, limited renewables capacity, and energy demand growing four percent annually, and you get electricity prices rising roughly 8-10 percent per year.  

It’s easy to think fossil fuels will dominate Mexico’s energy investment, but that misses a major growth market – distributed solar photovoltaics. As an active developer in Mexico, I see three ways solar can help solve the country’s energy challenges. 

Expensive Fossil Fuels, Inefficient Infrastructure

First, thinking oil and gas will meet Mexico’s energy needs conveniently overlooks their development timelines. Finding new reserves, developing projects, and building pipelines takes years, not months.  Sure, in ten years sufficient fossil fuel resources should be on line to meet energy demands, but what if electricity demand outpaces capacity additions before then, or what if Mexico decides to export its new supplies?  

Fortunately solar power can fill this yawning gap between demand and supply in a short timeframe. Around 24 gigawatts (GW) of solar projects are in the development pipeline, waiting for reform to be converted into capacity auctions, which I expect to start happening within the next year.  

At that point, efficient construction practices can get solar energy contributing to power supply within months. In fact, 97 megawatts (MW) of solar are expected to go online this year, rising to 3.2 GW by 2018. 

Second, creating a fossil fuel-reliant energy system isn’t economically sustainable. The first blocks of fossil fuel resources may be easy to reach and affordable to develop, but once the low-hanging fruit is gone, unconventional resources become more expensive. Relying on fossil fuels may ironically lock Mexico into a future of rising energy prices. 

Compare that volatile outlook to solar’s stability. Module prices are at historic lows, and Mexico has one of the world’s largest levels of solar insolation, creating consistently strong output. Customers know exactly what their solar system will cost up front and once built, they lock in decades of price stability and energy security at costs below grid averages. For context, Greenwood Energy, ILIOSS, and Schneider Electric are now developing commercial solar projects at up to 20 percent below grid prices. 

Third, Mexico’s grid is aged, with insufficient transmission to meet current demands or efficiently move electricity across long distances. Unlike the United States, smart grid technology hasn’t been installed, creating an estimated 15 percent line loss in 2012. Distributed solar can leapfrog these shortcomings by providing reliable electricity in close proximity to demand.  

Commercial Projects, Not Residential, Look Best

So how will this opportunity play out? I expect new development to center on 150 kilowatt to 5 MW capacity projects for the biggest companies in Mexico, because they’re the ones with the largest power demand and the most to gain from long-term power prices.  

Businesses represent 65 percent of the country’s total electrical sales, creating vast opportunity – our Mexican development partner ILIOSS is currently installing 33 MW of new projects for leading retailer Tiendas Soriana, among other big customers like CINEPOLIS, the largest cinema chain in Latin America. 

After large corporate entities, solar will similarly spread to small- and medium-size enterprises, but the residential market will take years to mature. Unlike in America, where rooftop solar is already at grid parity in many regions, residential solar doesn’t make much sense today because Mexico’s government subsidizes the electricity bills of around 80 percent of the homeowners. 

Convincing Customers Comes First

While solar enjoys favorable advantages, I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention three challenges facing developers in Mexico’s market, starting with the core of any deal – customers.  

Unfamiliarity is the first challenge facing solar developers. Mexicans are accustomed to having one state-owned utility, so the idea of a 20-year power-purchase agreement (PPA) with a new power company is a foreign concept.

Once developers get over that initial hump, they’ll have to consider contract rates – will a 20-year contract at 10 cents per kilowatt-hour with an escalator clause provide the most competitive price over a contract’s duration? 

Indeed, setting the right escalator is critical to success given that the equipment is paid in US dollars and the PPAs are usually in local currency. Escalators should ideally blend a minimum fixed price with local inflation and/or local power prices. But customers may also feel a need to hedge, much as they would do it with conventional power purchases – if inflation and power prices rise, is a set rate through a fixed escalator or an unknown rate tied to the market better? It’s definitely a balancing act. 

Solving Financing’s Currency Mismatch

Once the customer is convinced, developers will face their second challenge – securing long term debt financing. As stated above, Mexican PPAs will likely be in pesos, which may lose value compared to investment capital funded in dollars.  

This creates a currency mismatch, so developers should lock in debt financing for at least 20 years at a reasonable interest rate – a tricky proposition in pesos because they’re more expensive in long-term loans and rely on multilateral lenders. Mexico could smooth this process out by developing the local lending market or working to flatten interest rate curves.

Energy Reforms Could Limit Growth

Ironically, solar’s third challenge in Mexico is the same energy sector reform that created a competitive wholesale market for renewables. Neither foreign investment nor the country’s ambitious 35% by 2024 non-fossil energy target will happen without a credible clean energy credit (CEC) market and/or well-structured capacity auctions.  

Reform has created the ability to issue and trade CECs, but market mechanisms are still being developed, and they’ll be critical to new capacity. Many of the renewable regulatory schemes are administrative resolutions that can be modified over time, creating long-term uncertainty. 

Consider lessons from renewable energy credit (REC) markets in America. In New Jersey, the market lost credibility when prices swung hundreds of dollars in just a few years. Massachusetts tried to prevent the same problem with a floor and schedule for RECs, but investors were still paying much lower five-year REC prices for years because they didn’t trust the system.

This problem can be multiplied in a country with corruption issues, so if the REC system is compliance-driven without transparency, Mexico’s RECs may be considered poor investments.

Capacity auctions will face similar challenges. If developers don’t trust the RECs, they’ll bid higher into auctions to secure favorable economics, but if they bid too high, fewer tenders will be awarded. Likewise, if auction requirements are strict like in Brazil where local content requirements are enforced, prices will be higher and new projects will be limited.

Can Mexico Become Latin America’s Solar Leader?

The devil is truly in the details for Mexico’s energy market reform – how long are PPAs, and in which currency? How transparent and stable is the REC market? What kind of escalators will developers be allowed to use?

Even though there’s risk involved, developers should be extremely bullish on solar power’s Mexican potential. In time, I think it’ll be the largest solar market in all of Latin America.    

Authored By:
Camilo Patrignani is CEO of Greenwood Energy, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Libra Group. He has a Bachelor of Business Administration and an MBA from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Camilo oversees strategic direction for Greenwood renewable energy investments across North and Latin America, and brings over 20 years’ of project finance experience to this role. Prior to Greenwood, he was Vice President of Fortress Investment

Other Posts by: Camilo Patrignani

Related Posts

The Complex LNG Supply Chain By Michael Schwartz


November, 03 2014

Richard Vesel says

Mexico may provide an interesting "laboratory" for the deployment of renewable energy forms in that is has many of the characteristics desirable in such a laboratory: - lots of arid open spaces, with little or no population - the country itself has very limited financial resources - much of it is located in a tropical zone, with plenty of heat and sunshine - water is at a premium in much of the country - the political climate is variable and shaky

Not an ideal situation, thus making it representative of a good portion of the third world (no offense to the country itself).


November, 06 2014

Richard Vesel says


No one expects an "overnight" shift away from fossil fuels, except perhaps the totally ignorant and/or foolish. What is reasonable to expect is a 50% in fossil fuel generated CO2 by 2050, and 95% reduction by 2100. That is what it will take to stabilize atmospheric CO2 below 600ppm, assuming we cease deforestation and other destructive activities.

So, what can we do in the span of the first 35 years? Growth rates do not have to be outrageously high in order to achieve this. Remind yourself as to how quickly gas from fracking came into play here. Once the technique made it into the field, it was a mere decade to supply huge amounts of substantially cleaner energy to the market with this resource, at absurdly low prices. Similar things can happen with solar and wind, hydro, geothermal, and even nuclear. Mechanical issues, grid stabilization issues, and other "issues" can be solved without overwhelming costs, but rather through prudent approaches, equipment life-cycle planning, and the political will to enforce sane practices upon developers and industry. "Wildcatting" practices should be curtailed and replaced with responsible development plans, using all of the lessons learned along the way so far.

As far as turbine gearbox failures - these are well-known within the industry, and the equipment builders are using 60's era manufacturing philosophies based on planned obsolescence and failure in order to keep their retrofit businesses in profit. How long will it take them to learn that this is not the best way forward? Maybe when a reliable turbine supplier comes along and eats their lunch based on 20-year reliability performance, and/or gearless operation (hydro-coupling?), etc.

How do I know this? We are trying to sell vibration monitoring systems to the wind turbine manufacturers, and they resist the comparatively small expenses which would provide them with early warning of problems with all rotating components in their nacelles...


November, 07 2014

Don Hirschberg says

World coal production was 4677, 7704,and 78.23 Mt in 1990.2012.and 2013 respectively.

We were unequivocally told by “all competent scientists” that the CO2 rate of 1990 was the top limit from which we could “ever” recover – no matter what we subsequently did.

Well world coal usage in 2013 was 176% of the 1990 rate. Even if we allow “all competent scientists “ a very generous amount of slack they still look like a row of you know what.

Solar and wind have not even stopped the growth of coal - much less even started nibbling at usage.

And every year we have more people without electricity service.

November, 09 2014

Don Hirschberg says

I suppose I should have given the numbers for oil usage growth as I did for coal above.

Current oil production is about 85million b/d. In 1990 about 60 million b/d. So CO2 emissions from oil have gone up about 42 % over the period.

Increased use of battery operated cars is not likely to reduce CO2 emissions much, if any. People are likely to put their batteries on charge at night when more electricity is generated by fossil fuels.

November, 23 2014

Gary Vesperman says

The Gallery of Clean Energy Inventions includes 41 generators, 16 advanced self-powered electric vehicle innovations, 25 radioactivity neutralization methods, 22 space travel innovations, 10 technical solutions to water shortages, and torsion field school network. See $1 billion would establish a comprehensive proactive clean energy inventions evaluation and development organization headquartered in Nevada. Clean energy inventions would be much cheaper, healthier and better for our environment than obsolete energy sources like solar, wind, uranium, and fossil fuels. For example the $2.2 billion Ivanpah solar thermal generator near Las Vegas is inefficient and kills 28,000 birds a year!

Add your comments:

Please log in to leave a comment!
back to top

Receive Energy Central eNews & Updates