The Supreme Court Did Not 'Stay' Energy Efficiency

Posted on May 06, 2016
Posted By: Ann Livingston

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) included many references to energy efficiency as a strategy to achieve Clean Power Plan (CPP) compliance and encouraged states and utilities to pursue this path.  Even though the Supreme Court of the United States has issued a "stay" on the CPP, some states are moving ahead with CPP planning and/or related efforts.  We appreciate these efforts as the CPP represents a significant step forward in our nation's efforts to mitigate against climate change.  

Including energy efficiency as a compliance option under the CPP, as the EPA has done, will enable states and utilities to meet the emissions reduction goals at "least cost" and quite likely with net economic benefits for households, businesses and the economy as a whole. Indeed, the EPA estimates that, if the CPP is implemented, CO2 emissions will decline 32% by 2030 from 2005 levels and that net benefits will be in the range of $26-$45 billion.

Energy efficiency has long been recognized as a least-cost resource, but it is also now a potential least-cost compliance path under the CPP regulations and related state-based efforts.  By establishing an overarching least-cost compliance requirement or objective in state plans and in agency decision-making under the CPP and related efforts, compliance strategies will inevitably include a high level of energy efficiency. Using the least-cost compliance path as a filter as state agencies consider which options will be included in state plans filed with the EPA or otherwise enacted by individual states ensures that energy efficiency will be a critical component of those state plans. It also ensures that consumers (ratepayers) are protected from unnecessary rate increases and that utilities are operating in a financially efficient manner in relation to CPP compliance or other state-based efforts to reduce CO2 emissions.

SWEEP has conducted its own study of the net economic benefits that could result in our region (AZ, CO, NM, NV, UT, and WY) if utilities implement well-funded and effective energy efficiency programs as one of their key CPP compliance strategies. The results are preliminary but indicate that efforts to save energy from efficiency programs implemented from 2016 through 2030 could result in around $9 billion in net economic benefits for the SWEEP region. No matter what happens to the CPP in the current legal proceedings, achieving (or in some cases maintaining) strong energy efficiency programs is a sensible strategy for all states.

A number of states in our region-including Colorado, Nevada, and New Mexico as well as major utilities in those states-recognize that man-made climate change is occurring and is dangerous. In response, they are actively working to reduce their utility sector CO2 emissions-and doing so regardless of whether or not the CPP is upheld by the courts. Energy efficiency can and should be an important component of these state- and utility-led efforts.

It is important to note that utilizing energy efficiency as a compliance strategy is not required under the CPP.  As a result, we won't know until individual state plans are drafted and then approved by the EPA (or adopted separately from the CPP) whether or not energy efficiency will play a prominent role in each state's compliance or broader air quality efforts.  SWEEP has been working with the states in our region to ensure that efficiency is a core component in the state plans that Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming will prepare and submit to the EPA for approval, assuming the legality of the CPP is upheld.

Every utility customer should be interested in efficiency as a least-cost energy resource, but it is certainly the case that both industrial customers and low-income advocates are particularly focused on maintaining low energy costs. And, as the old infomercials used to say, "but wait, there's more," energy efficiency also supports local job creation through sales and installation of energy efficiency measures such as LED lamps, smart thermostats, industrial process controls, energy-efficient cooling systems, and improvements to the building envelope. As a result, the strategy of focusing on a least-cost compliance path benefits the environment, the local economy, and consumers of all types, including vulnerable populations.

In short, energy efficiency is the smartest, least-cost compliance path under the CPP as well as for state- and utility-led efforts to reduce harmful CO2 emissions. 

Authored By:
Ann Livingston is Program Manager for State and Local Engagement with the Southwest Energy Efficiency Project (SWEEP). Ann has extensive experience in policy, planning, and program work in energy, green building, and sustainability. For over 15 years she has worked on a wide range of related issues, including energy efficiency, renewable energy, green buildings, climate change, transportation, community development, land use, zero waste, finance, toxics, water, economic development, and healthy

Related Posts

Why not ditch the TRC? By Rasika Athawale


May, 06 2016

Richard Vesel says

Good overview article, Ann.

For better or for worse, the EPA removed demand-side EE as on of the four pillars of the CPP. I am not sure about the wisdom of that. If a state or region could show continuing net declines in total fossil energy consumption year over year, with specific parallel performance sub-metrics for power generation, then it would seem that state/regional plans could make a great argument to a de facto reincorporation of demand-side EE.

On the plus side, DOE is ratcheting up demand-side EE for major residential energy consumption systems, specifically HVAC and hot water systems. These are decades long programs, however, and the more rapid our social response, the better off we'll be.

Reality check: Hottest March 1880 to 2016 was...March, 2016 Highest levels of atmospheric CO2 measured in the past 2M+ years: April 2016 (over 407ppm)


Add your comments:

Please log in to leave a comment!
back to top

Receive Energy Central eNews & Updates


12th Annual Electricity Flexibility, Ancillary Services and Balancing Forum

Wednesday Feb 19, 2020 - Friday Feb 21, 2020 - Vienna Austria

This marcus evans conference plays a crucial part in a strategy that involves keeping ahead and gaining the decision-making edge for system operators, power distribution companies and ancillary services in the energy industry. more...

Utility Telecoms 2020

Tuesday Feb 25, 2020 - Thursday Feb 27, 2020 - Amsterdam The Netherlands

Utility Telecoms 2020 brings together technical utility telecom professionals to review the application and future of MPLS networks. 14+ utility case studies over three days addressing the technology, strategy, application, implementation, and configuration issues that need to be considered before more...